Omni-Channel Replatforming
Execution · FixedFee · Aug 1, 2025 → Jun 30, 2026
Project critical
2 concerns: Budget, Risks.
Health drivers
Signals contributing to overall project health.
- HighBudgetBurn 15% above plan.
- CriticalRisks2 open Critical risks.
Financial health
Burn vs. plan, margin now and at completion.
- Total budget
- $5,600,000
- Actual cost
- $5,340,000
- Planned value (BCWS)
- $4,650,000
- Earned value (BCWP)
- $4,500,000
- Estimate to complete
- $850,000
- Remaining budget
- $260,000
- Burn vs plan
- 115%
- Current margin
- -19%
- Forecast margin
- -11%
Over budget
Team
Engagement leadership. Full allocations land with the resource service.
- Client
- Polaris Retail Group
- Industry
- Retail
- Account owner
- Marcus Whitfield
- Partner
- Marcus Whitfield
- Project manager
- Nadia Volkova
Per-resource allocations and over/underutilization land with the resource-planning slice.
Delivery milestones
In-flight delivery milestones with PM-reported confidence.
No milestones recorded.
Risks & change events
Open risks and recent changes affecting scope, schedule, or staffing.
Open risks
- CriticalUAT defects 2× expected — go-live at riskQuality · 85% likely · Go-live slip + uncosted hyper-care
- CriticalMargin will turn negative without scope freezeBudget · 90% likely · Forecast margin -2%
- HighTwo senior consultants signaling burnoutStaffing · 70% likely · Loss of institutional knowledge
Recent change events
- RiskClient requested extended hyper-care — uncostedApr 29, 2026 · +$300k uncovered
- StaffingAdded 2 emergency QA contractorsApr 26, 2026 · +$80k/month run-rate
- ScheduleGo-live pushed from W21 to W24Apr 23, 2026 · +3 weeks
- ScopeReturns flow descoped — pushed to phase 2Apr 19, 2026 · Reduced scope
Leadership actions
Recommended interventions surfaced by health signals.
- HighSchedule a portfolio review for this engagement.Project health is Red; pull the PM and partner into a 30-minute review this week.